Advertising
on Google and Facebook can be a powerful and efficient means of reaching
customers. Neither, however, is for the faint of heart. Good marketers must
study the pros and cons of advertising on either venue, if at all. Surely it
holds the potential to reach customers quickly. But good marketers much measure
and monitor closely the costs associated with each.
There
are pros and cons of advertising on each vehicle.
The pros of advertising on Facebook:
Brand
Awareness: Since Facebook is so immensely popular with more than 150 million
members (USA only), it’s a good place to simply increase awareness of your
product or company.
Largest
Audience: Facebook has the largest daily audience of active users of any
website in the United States, and compared to Google, users stay on the site
for longer periods of time.
Demographical
Reach: Facebook allows for some
interesting demographical reach with his paid advertising. Paid advertisements
may be focused by gender, age, religion, interest groups, and by other
demographics. This is not possible on Google.
Cost:
Generally speaking, experts say Facebook advertising is cheaper than Google
search. However, marketers should carefully monitor and measure these costs (Laird,
2002).
Ad
Types: Facebook allows for different forms of text and image contextual
advertisements. However, Google is offering a wider variety of paid search ads
now including with images, phone numbers, and video.
The cons of advertising on Facebook:
Click-thru
Rate: The click-thru rate on Facebook is notably lower than on Google. This may
increase costs to get the same result vs. Google paid search.
Exposure:
Unlike paid search on Google, ads on Facebook are limited to Facebook. You
cannot reach beyond Facebook. This provides limitations.
Analysis:
Facebook offers very little analytical data to help measure and monitor clicks,
impressions, and conversions. Google offers very deep analysis. This gives good
marketers a challenge.
The pros of advertising on Google:
Audience:
Google simply has a huge audience. While Facebook itself has more time spent on
its site, the Google Display Network more page views - including Youtube,
Blogger, and Gmail (Wordstream, 2002).
Channel
of Advertising: Google paid search offer display, banner, phone, video, text,
and other forms of advertising. This allows for more testing and greater chance
of success. Google also offers mobile reach, which Facebook does not.
Analysis:
Google paid search offers advanced targeting tools, so advanced you can get
certified in it. This is a huge advantage over Facebook in terms of ability to
measure ROI of advertisements. It even contains built-in conversion and revenue
The cons of advertising on Google:
Expense:
The primary disadvantage of paid advertising on Google is expense. Because
advertisers have gone to Google in droves, the bids are quiet high and can be
very expensive. Google paid search can be cost prohibitive and good marketers
much carefully measure ROI. Some keywords can run as high as $55 per click
(Wauter, 2011).
Overall,
Google paid search offers marketers better capacity and more opportunity for
success, but at greater cost.
Sources:
Laird, H. (n.d.). Facebook Advertising
– Advantages &
Disadvantages. Hallam Internet. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.hallaminternet.com/2012/facebook-advertising-advantages-disadvantages/
Facebook IPO: Can Facebook Beat the
Google Display Network in Online Advertising? | WordStream. (n.d.). Facebook
IPO: Can Facebook Beat the Google Display Network in Online Advertising? |
WordStream. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.wordstream.com/articles/facebook-vs-google-display-network
Wauters, R. (n.d.). What Are The 20
Most Expensive Keyword Categories In Google AdWords? TechCrunch.
Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/18/most-expensive-google-adwords-keywords/
No comments:
Post a Comment